Suspension in Epistemology and Beyond
About this ebook
- What is the nature of suspension?
- Can we suspend judgment voluntarily?
- Is there more than one kind of suspension?
- What are the norms for suspension?
- What is the relation between epistemic and prudential norms for suspension?
- What is the logic of suspension and how can we formally represent different forms of suspension?
- What is the role of suspension for rational decision?
- What is the relation of suspension of judgment and abstention of action?
- What is the relation between suspension and inquiry?
- How does suspension relate to doubt, ignorance, and indecision?
- How does the Pyrrhonian notion of suspension of judgment relate to modern accounts?
Suspension in Epistemology and Beyond will be of interest to scholars and graduate students working in epistemology, philosophy of mind, and history of philosophy.
About the author
Verena Wagner is professor of philosophy of mind at Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and the Berlin School of Mind and Brain. She works at the intersection of philosophy of mind and epistemology. Her publications include Agnosticism as Settled Indecision (2022, Philosophical Studies), Bracketing (2025, Philosophical Issues) and three articles in Routledge collections: Epistemic Dilemma and Epistemic Conflict (2021), Zetetic Seemings and Their Role in Inquiry (2023) and Zetetic Norms: A Puzzle for Evidentialism? (2025).
Alexandra Zinke is professor of theoretical philosophy at the University of Frankfurt. Her research focuses on epistemology and the philosophy of logic. She is the author of The Metaphyics of Logical Consequence (Klostermann, 2018) and has published articles in Erkenntnis, The Journal of Philosophy, The Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophical Studies, and Synthese.
