The Structure of Policy Change
2018. ápr. · University of Chicago Press
E-könyv
208
Oldalak száma
family_home
Használható
info
reportAz értékelések és vélemények nincsenek ellenőrizve További információ
Információk az e-könyvről
When the Soviet Union launched Sputnik, the Red Scare seized the American public. While President Eisenhower cautioned restraint, his hand was forced, and NASA’s budget had increased five thousand percent over its pre-Sputnik levels by the time President Kennedy proposed landing a man on the moon. Spending on the space race is in no way unique; Almost every policy area has its own Sputnik-type story, where waves of popular support for an idea (or disillusionment with a previous one) created new political priorities, resulting in dramatic changes to the budget or compelling agencies to respond quickly with little knowledge or preparation. Is this instability an inherent feature of the policy process, or is it possible for an agency to deal with problems in a way that insulates it from swings in public opinion and thus imposes some stability on the decision making process?
Derek A. Epp argues that some agencies can indeed do that and that instability is at least partially a function of poor institutional design. While it is inherently more challenging to maintain stability around complex problems like immigration or climate change, the deliberative process itself can affect the degree of stability around an issue. Epp looks at whether agencies follow a deliberative model for decision making, in which policies are developed by means of debate among a small group of policymakers, or a collective model, in which the opinions of many people are aggregated, as with the stock market. He argues that, in many instances, the collective model produces more informed and stable policy outcomes that can be adapted more readily to new information and changing public priorities.
Derek A. Epp argues that some agencies can indeed do that and that instability is at least partially a function of poor institutional design. While it is inherently more challenging to maintain stability around complex problems like immigration or climate change, the deliberative process itself can affect the degree of stability around an issue. Epp looks at whether agencies follow a deliberative model for decision making, in which policies are developed by means of debate among a small group of policymakers, or a collective model, in which the opinions of many people are aggregated, as with the stock market. He argues that, in many instances, the collective model produces more informed and stable policy outcomes that can be adapted more readily to new information and changing public priorities.
A szerzőről
Derek A. Epp is assistant professor of political science in the Department of Government at the University of Texas at Austin.
E-könyv értékelése
Mondd el a véleményedet.
Olvasási információk
Okostelefonok és táblagépek
Telepítsd a Google Play Könyvek alkalmazást Android- vagy iPad/iPhone eszközre. Az alkalmazás automatikusan szinkronizálódik a fiókoddal, így bárhol olvashatsz online és offline állapotban is.
Laptopok és számítógépek
A Google Playen vásárolt hangoskönyveidet a számítógép böngészőjében is meghallgathatod.
E-olvasók és más eszközök
E-tinta alapú eszközökön (például Kobo e-könyv-olvasón) való olvasáshoz le kell tölteni egy fájlt, és átvinni azt a készülékre. A Súgó részletes utasításait követve lehet átvinni a fájlokat a támogatott e-könyv-olvasókra.
