Secularism and Freedom of Conscience
เจ
เจเจคเฉ 2011 ยท Harvard University Press
เจ-เจเจฟเจคเจพเจฌ
160
เจชเฉฐเจจเฉ
reportเจฐเฉเจเจฟเฉฐเจเจพเจ เจ
เจคเฉ เจธเจฎเฉเจเจฟเจเจตเจพเจ เจฆเฉ เจชเฉเจธเจผเจเฉ เจจเจนเฉเจ เจเฉเจคเฉ เจเจ เจนเฉ ย เจนเฉเจฐ เจเจพเจฃเฉ
เจเจธ เจ-เจเจฟเจคเจพเจฌ เจฌเจพเจฐเฉ
Jocelyn Maclure and Charles Taylor provide a clearly reasoned, articulate account of secularism how it may offer the only path to religious and philosophical freedom.
Secularism: the definition of this word is as practical and urgent as income inequalities or the paths to sustainable development. In this wide-ranging analysis, Jocelyn Maclure and Charles Taylor provide a clearly reasoned, articulate account of the two main principles of secularismโequal respect, and freedom of conscienceโand its two operative modesโseparation of Church (or mosque or temple) and State, and State neutrality vis-ร -vis religions. But more crucially, they make the powerful argument that in our ever more religiously diverse, politically interconnected world, secularism, properly understood, may offer the only path to religious and philosophical freedom.
Secularism and Freedom of Conscience grew out of a very real problemโQuebecโs need for guidelines to balance the equal respect due to all citizens with the right to religious freedom. But the authors go further, rethinking secularism in light of other critical issues of our time. The relationship between religious beliefs and deeply-held secular convictions, the scope of the free exercise of religion, and the place of religion in the public sphere are aspects of the larger challenge Maclure and Taylor address: how to manage moral and religious diversity in a free society. Secularism, they show, is essential to any liberal democracy in which citizens adhere to a plurality of conceptions of what gives meaning and direction to human life. The working model the authors construct in this nuanced account is capacious enough to accommodate difference and freedom of conscience, while holding out hope for a world in which diversity no longer divides us.
Secularism: the definition of this word is as practical and urgent as income inequalities or the paths to sustainable development. In this wide-ranging analysis, Jocelyn Maclure and Charles Taylor provide a clearly reasoned, articulate account of the two main principles of secularismโequal respect, and freedom of conscienceโand its two operative modesโseparation of Church (or mosque or temple) and State, and State neutrality vis-ร -vis religions. But more crucially, they make the powerful argument that in our ever more religiously diverse, politically interconnected world, secularism, properly understood, may offer the only path to religious and philosophical freedom.
Secularism and Freedom of Conscience grew out of a very real problemโQuebecโs need for guidelines to balance the equal respect due to all citizens with the right to religious freedom. But the authors go further, rethinking secularism in light of other critical issues of our time. The relationship between religious beliefs and deeply-held secular convictions, the scope of the free exercise of religion, and the place of religion in the public sphere are aspects of the larger challenge Maclure and Taylor address: how to manage moral and religious diversity in a free society. Secularism, they show, is essential to any liberal democracy in which citizens adhere to a plurality of conceptions of what gives meaning and direction to human life. The working model the authors construct in this nuanced account is capacious enough to accommodate difference and freedom of conscience, while holding out hope for a world in which diversity no longer divides us.
เจฒเฉเจเจ เจฌเจพเจฐเฉ
Charles Taylor works creatively with material drawn from both analytical and Continental sources. He was born in Montreal, educated at McGill and Oxford universities, and has taught political science and philosophy at McGill since 1961. He describes himself as a social democrat, and he was a founder and editor of the New Left Review. Taylor's work is an example of renewed interest in the great traditional questions of philosophy. It is informed by a vast scope of literature, ranging from Plato to Jacques Derrida. More accessible to the average reader than most recent original work in philosophy, Taylor's oeuvre centers on questions on philosophical anthropology, that is, on how human nature relates to ethics and society. Taylor develops his themes with an engaging, historically accurate insight.
เจเจธ เจ-เจเจฟเจคเจพเจฌ เจจเฉเฉฐ เจฐเฉเจ เจเจฐเฉ
เจเจชเจฃเฉ เจตเจฟเจเจพเจฐ เจฆเฉฑเจธเฉ
เจชเฉเฉเจนเจจ เจธเฉฐเจฌเฉฐเจงเฉ เจเจพเจฃเจเจพเจฐเฉ
เจธเจฎเจพเจฐเจเจซเจผเฉเจจ เจ
เจคเฉ เจเฉเจฌเจฒเฉเฉฑเจ
Google Play Books เจเจช เจจเฉเฉฐ Android เจ
เจคเฉ iPad/iPhone เจฒเจ เจธเจฅเจพเจชเจค เจเจฐเฉเฅค เจเจน เจคเฉเจนเจพเจกเฉ เจเจพเจคเฉ เจจเจพเจฒ เจธเจตเฉเจเจฒเจฟเจค เจคเฉเจฐ 'เจคเฉ เจธเจฟเฉฐเจ เจเจฐเจฆเฉ เจนเฉ เจ
เจคเฉ เจคเฉเจนเจพเจจเฉเฉฐ เจเจฟเจคเฉเจ เจตเฉ เจเจจเจฒเจพเจเจจ เจเจพเจ เจเจซเจผเจฒเจพเจเจจ เจชเฉเฉเจนเจจ เจฆเจฟเฉฐเจฆเฉ เจนเฉเฅค
เจฒเฉเจชเจเจพเจช เจ
เจคเฉ เจเฉฐเจชเจฟเจเจเจฐ
เจคเฉเจธเฉเจ เจเจชเจฃเฉ เจเฉฐเจชเจฟเจเจเจฐ เจฆเจพ เจตเฉเฉฑเจฌ เจฌเฉเจฐเจพเจเจเจผเจฐ เจตเจฐเจคเจฆเฉ เจนเฉเจ Google Play 'เจคเฉ เจเจฐเฉเจฆเฉเจเจ เจเจเจเจ เจเจกเฉเจ-เจเจฟเจคเจพเจฌเจพเจ เจธเฉเจฃ เจธเจเจฆเฉ เจนเฉเฅค
eReaders เจ
เจคเฉ เจนเฉเจฐ เจกเฉเจตเจพเจเจธเจพเจ
e-ink เจกเฉเจตเจพเจเจธเจพเจ 'เจคเฉ เจชเฉเฉเจนเจจ เจฒเจ เจเจฟเจตเฉเจ Kobo eReaders, เจคเฉเจนเจพเจจเฉเฉฐ เฉเจพเจเจฒ เจกเจพเจเจจเจฒเฉเจก เจเจฐเจจ เจ
เจคเฉ เจเจธเจจเฉเฉฐ เจเจชเจฃเฉ เจกเฉเจตเจพเจเจธ 'เจคเฉ เจเฉเจฐเจพเจเจธเจซเจฐ เจเจฐเจจ เจฆเฉ เจฒเฉเฉ เจนเฉเจตเฉเจเฉเฅค เจธเจฎเจฐเจฅเจฟเจค eReaders 'เจคเฉ เฉเจพเจเจฒเจพเจ เจเฉเจฐเจพเจเจธเจซเจฐ เจเจฐเจจ เจฒเจ เจตเฉเจฐเจตเฉ เจธเจนเจฟเจค เจฎเจฆเจฆ เจเฉเจเจฆเจฐ เจนเจฟเจฆเจพเจเจคเจพเจ เจฆเฉ เจชเจพเจฒเจฃเจพ เจเจฐเฉเฅค
