Purposive Interpretation in Law

Β· Princeton University Press
Π•-ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°
448
Π‘Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½ΠΈΡ†ΠΈ
Π‘ΠΎΠΎΠ΄Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π½Π°
ΠžΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ ΠΈ Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅Π½Π·ΠΈΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π½Π΅ сС ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π²Ρ€Π΄Π΅Π½ΠΈ Β Π”ΠΎΠ·Π½Π°Ρ˜Ρ‚Π΅ повСќС

Π—Π° Π΅-ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°Π²Π°

This book presents a comprehensive theory of legal interpretation, by a leading judge and legal theorist. Currently, legal philosophers and jurists apply different theories of interpretation to constitutions, statutes, rules, wills, and contracts. Aharon Barak argues that an alternative approach--purposive interpretation--allows jurists and scholars to approach all legal texts in a similar manner while remaining sensitive to the important differences. Moreover, regardless of whether purposive interpretation amounts to a unifying theory, it would still be superior to other methods of interpretation in tackling each kind of text separately.


Barak explains purposive interpretation as follows: All legal interpretation must start by establishing a range of semantic meanings for a given text, from which the legal meaning is then drawn. In purposive interpretation, the text's "purpose" is the criterion for establishing which of the semantic meanings yields the legal meaning. Establishing the ultimate purpose--and thus the legal meaning--depends on the relationship between the subjective and objective purposes; that is, between the original intent of the text's author and the intent of a reasonable author and of the legal system at the time of interpretation. This is easy to establish when the subjective and objective purposes coincide. But when they don't, the relative weight given to each purpose depends on the nature of the text. For example, subjective purpose is given substantial weight in interpreting a will; objective purpose, in interpreting a constitution.


Barak develops this theory with masterful scholarship and close attention to its practical application. Throughout, he contrasts his approach with that of textualists and neotextualists such as Antonin Scalia, pragmatists such as Richard Posner, and legal philosophers such as Ronald Dworkin. This book represents a profoundly important contribution to legal scholarship and a major alternative to interpretive approaches advanced by other leading figures in the judicial world.

Π—Π° Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡ‚

Aharon Barak was president of the Supreme Court of Israel until his retirement in 2006. He is the author of Judicial Discretion, The Judge in a Democracy, numerous articles in English-language law journals, and several books in Hebrew. He is the winner of the 2006 Gruber Justice Prize from the Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation. He is the author of Judicial Discretion (Yale), numerous articles in English-language law journals, and several books in Hebrew.

ΠžΡ†Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ ја Π΅-ΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³Π°Π²Π°

ΠšΠ°ΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚Π΅ Π½ΠΈ ΡˆΡ‚ΠΎ мислитС.

Π˜Π½Ρ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π·Π° Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°ΡšΠ΅

ΠŸΠ°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π½ΠΈ Ρ‚Π΅Π»Π΅Ρ„ΠΎΠ½ΠΈ ΠΈ Ρ‚Π°Π±Π»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΈ
Π˜Π½ΡΡ‚Π°Π»ΠΈΡ€Π°Ρ˜Ρ‚Π΅ ја Π°ΠΏΠ»ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΡ˜Π°Ρ‚Π° Google Play Books Π·Π° Android ΠΈ iPad/iPhone. Автоматски сС синхронизира со смСтката ΠΈ Π²ΠΈ ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠ·ΠΌΠΎΠΆΡƒΠ²Π° Π΄Π° Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅ онлајн ΠΈΠ»ΠΈ ΠΎΡ„Π»Π°Ρ˜Π½ ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π΅ ΠΈ Π΄Π° стС.
Π›Π°ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΠΏΠΈ ΠΈ ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ˜ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈ
МоТС Π΄Π° ΡΠ»ΡƒΡˆΠ°Ρ‚Π΅ Π°ΡƒΠ΄ΠΈΠΎΠΊΠ½ΠΈΠ³ΠΈ ΠΊΡƒΠΏΠ΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΎΠ΄ Google Play со ΠΊΠΎΡ€ΠΈΡΡ‚Π΅ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° Π²Π΅Π±-прСлистувачот Π½Π° ΠΊΠΎΠΌΠΏΡ˜ΡƒΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΎΡ‚.
Π•-Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ ΠΈ Π΄Ρ€ΡƒΠ³ΠΈ ΡƒΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈ
Π—Π° Π΄Π° Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Π΅ Π½Π° ΡƒΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΈ со Π΅-мастило, ΠΊΠ°ΠΊΠΎ ΡˆΡ‚ΠΎ сС Π΅-Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Kobo, ќС Ρ‚Ρ€Π΅Π±Π° Π΄Π° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Π΅ Π΄Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΠ° ΠΈ Π΄Π° ја ΠΏΡ€Π΅Ρ„Ρ€Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π½Π° ΡƒΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΎΡ‚. Π‘Π»Π΅Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π΅ Π³ΠΈ Π΄Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»Π½ΠΈΡ‚Π΅ упатства Π²ΠΎ Π¦Π΅Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ€ΠΎΡ‚ Π·Π° помош Π·Π° ΠΏΡ€Π΅Ρ„Ρ€Π»Π°ΡšΠ΅ Π½Π° Π΄Π°Ρ‚ΠΎΡ‚Π΅ΠΊΠΈΡ‚Π΅ Π½Π° ΠΏΠΎΠ΄Π΄Ρ€ΠΆΠ°Π½ΠΈ Π΅-Ρ‡ΠΈΡ‚Π°Ρ‡ΠΈ.