Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress
มิ.ย. 2011 · Princeton University Press
eBook
376
หน้า
family_home
มีสิทธิ์
info
reportคะแนนและรีวิวไม่ได้รับการตรวจสอบยืนยัน ดูข้อมูลเพิ่มเติม
เกี่ยวกับ eBook เล่มนี้
From the 1910 overthrow of "Czar" Joseph Cannon to the reforms enacted when Republicans took over the House in 1995, institutional change within the U.S. Congress has been both a product and a shaper of congressional politics. For several decades, scholars have explained this process in terms of a particular collective interest shared by members, be it partisanship, reelection worries, or policy motivations. Eric Schickler makes the case that it is actually interplay among multiple interests that determines institutional change. In the process, he explains how congressional institutions have proved remarkably adaptable and yet consistently frustrating for members and outside observers alike.
Analyzing leadership, committee, and procedural restructuring in four periods (1890-1910, 1919-1932, 1937-1952, and 1970-1989), Schickler argues that coalitions promoting a wide range of member interests drive change in both the House and Senate. He shows that multiple interests determine institutional innovation within a period; that different interests are important in different periods; and, more broadly, that changes in the salient collective interests across time do not follow a simple logical or developmental sequence. Institutional development appears disjointed, as new arrangements are layered on preexisting structures intended to serve competing interests. An epilogue assesses the rise and fall of Newt Gingrich in light of these findings.
Schickler's model of "disjointed pluralism" integrates rational choice theory with historical institutionalist approaches. It both complicates and advances efforts at theoretical synthesis by proposing a fuller, more nuanced understanding of institutional innovation--and thus of American political development and history.
Analyzing leadership, committee, and procedural restructuring in four periods (1890-1910, 1919-1932, 1937-1952, and 1970-1989), Schickler argues that coalitions promoting a wide range of member interests drive change in both the House and Senate. He shows that multiple interests determine institutional innovation within a period; that different interests are important in different periods; and, more broadly, that changes in the salient collective interests across time do not follow a simple logical or developmental sequence. Institutional development appears disjointed, as new arrangements are layered on preexisting structures intended to serve competing interests. An epilogue assesses the rise and fall of Newt Gingrich in light of these findings.
Schickler's model of "disjointed pluralism" integrates rational choice theory with historical institutionalist approaches. It both complicates and advances efforts at theoretical synthesis by proposing a fuller, more nuanced understanding of institutional innovation--and thus of American political development and history.
เกี่ยวกับผู้แต่ง
Eric Schickler is Assistant Professor of Political Science at the University of California, Berkeley.
ให้คะแนน eBook นี้
แสดงความเห็นของคุณให้เรารับรู้
ข้อมูลในการอ่าน
สมาร์ทโฟนและแท็บเล็ต
ติดตั้งแอป Google Play Books สำหรับ Android และ iPad/iPhone แอปจะซิงค์โดยอัตโนมัติกับบัญชีของคุณ และช่วยให้คุณอ่านแบบออนไลน์หรือออฟไลน์ได้ทุกที่
แล็ปท็อปและคอมพิวเตอร์
คุณฟังหนังสือเสียงที่ซื้อจาก Google Play โดยใช้เว็บเบราว์เซอร์ในคอมพิวเตอร์ได้
eReader และอุปกรณ์อื่นๆ
หากต้องการอ่านบนอุปกรณ์ e-ink เช่น Kobo eReader คุณจะต้องดาวน์โหลดและโอนไฟล์ไปยังอุปกรณ์ของคุณ โปรดทำตามวิธีการอย่างละเอียดในศูนย์ช่วยเหลือเพื่อโอนไฟล์ไปยัง eReader ที่รองรับ
