Descriptions and Beyond
Marga Reimer · Anne Bezuidenhout
āļ.āļ. 2004 · Oxford University Press
eBook
655
āļŦāļāđāļē
family_home
āļĄāļĩāļŠāļīāļāļāļīāđ
info
reportāļāļ°āđāļāļāđāļĨāļ°āļĢāļĩāļ§āļīāļ§āđāļĄāđāđāļāđāļĢāļąāļāļāļēāļĢāļāļĢāļ§āļāļŠāļāļāļĒāļ·āļāļĒāļąāļ Â āļāļđāļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļāļīāđāļĄāđāļāļīāļĄ
āđāļāļĩāđāļĒāļ§āļāļąāļ eBook āđāļĨāđāļĄāļāļĩāđ
In 1905, Bertrand Russell published 'On Denoting' in which he proposed and defended a quantificational account of definite descriptions. Forty-five years later, in 'On Referring', Peter Strawson claimed that Russell was mistaken: definite descriptions do not function as quantifiers but (paradigmatically) as referring expressions. Ever since, scores of theorists have attempted to adjudicate this debate. Others have gone beyond the question of the proper analysis of definite descriptions, focusing instead on the complex relations between definites, indefinites, and pronouns. These relations are often examined with attention to the phenomena of scope and anaphora. This collection assembles nineteen new papers on definite descriptions and related topics. The contributors include both philosophers and linguists, many of whom have been active participants in the various debates concerning descriptions. The volume contains a brief general introduction and is divided into six sections, each of which is accompanied by a detailed introduction of its own. Several of the sections concern issues associated with the Russell/Strawson debate. These include the sections on incomplete descriptions, the referential/attributive distinction, and presupposition and truth value gaps. There is also a section on the representation of definites and indefinites in semantic theory, containing papers that reject certain core assumptions of the Russellian paradigm. Linguists interested in definites have traditionally been concerned with how such expressions interact with other expressions, including pronouns and indefinites. They have explored, and continue to explore, these interactions through the complex phenomena of scope and anaphora. In the section dealing with anaphoric pronouns and descriptions, indefinites and dynamic syntax/semantics, five linguists propose and defend their views on these and related issues. Finally, there is a section that concerns the relation between proper names and descriptions and, more particularly, the idea that some names, those introduced into the language by description, are semantically equivalent to definite descriptions.
āđāļŦāđāļāļ°āđāļāļ eBook āļāļĩāđ
āđāļŠāļāļāļāļ§āļēāļĄāđāļŦāđāļāļāļāļāļāļļāļāđāļŦāđāđāļĢāļēāļĢāļąāļāļĢāļđāđ
āļāđāļāļĄāļđāļĨāđāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļēāļ
āļŠāļĄāļēāļĢāđāļāđāļāļāđāļĨāļ°āđāļāđāļāđāļĨāđāļ
āļāļīāļāļāļąāđāļāđāļāļ Google Play Books āļŠāļģāļŦāļĢāļąāļ Android āđāļĨāļ° iPad/iPhone āđāļāļāļāļ°āļāļīāļāļāđāđāļāļĒāļāļąāļāđāļāļĄāļąāļāļīāļāļąāļāļāļąāļāļāļĩāļāļāļāļāļļāļ āđāļĨāļ°āļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļŦāđāļāļļāļāļāđāļēāļāđāļāļāļāļāļāđāļĨāļāđāļŦāļĢāļ·āļāļāļāļāđāļĨāļāđāđāļāđāļāļļāļāļāļĩāđ
āđāļĨāđāļāļāđāļāļāđāļĨāļ°āļāļāļĄāļāļīāļ§āđāļāļāļĢāđ
āļāļļāļāļāļąāļāļŦāļāļąāļāļŠāļ·āļāđāļŠāļĩāļĒāļāļāļĩāđāļāļ·āđāļāļāļēāļ Google Play āđāļāļĒāđāļāđāđāļ§āđāļāđāļāļĢāļēāļ§āđāđāļāļāļĢāđāđāļāļāļāļĄāļāļīāļ§āđāļāļāļĢāđāđāļāđ
eReader āđāļĨāļ°āļāļļāļāļāļĢāļāđāļāļ·āđāļāđ
āļŦāļēāļāļāđāļāļāļāļēāļĢāļāđāļēāļāļāļāļāļļāļāļāļĢāļāđ e-ink āđāļāđāļ Kobo eReader āļāļļāļāļāļ°āļāđāļāļāļāļēāļ§āļāđāđāļŦāļĨāļāđāļĨāļ°āđāļāļāđāļāļĨāđāđāļāļĒāļąāļāļāļļāļāļāļĢāļāđāļāļāļāļāļļāļ āđāļāļĢāļāļāļģāļāļēāļĄāļ§āļīāļāļĩāļāļēāļĢāļāļĒāđāļēāļāļĨāļ°āđāļāļĩāļĒāļāđāļāļĻāļđāļāļĒāđāļāđāļ§āļĒāđāļŦāļĨāļ·āļāđāļāļ·āđāļāđāļāļāđāļāļĨāđāđāļāļĒāļąāļ eReader āļāļĩāđāļĢāļāļāļĢāļąāļ
