Democracies at War
ივლ. 2010 · Princeton University Press
ელწიგნი
304
გვერდი
family_home
მისაღები
info
reportრეიტინგები და მიმოხილვები დაუდასტურებელია შეიტყვეთ მეტი
ამ ელწიგნის შესახებ
Why do democracies win wars? This is a critical question in the study of international relations, as a traditional view--expressed most famously by Alexis de Tocqueville--has been that democracies are inferior in crafting foreign policy and fighting wars. In Democracies at War, the first major study of its kind, Dan Reiter and Allan Stam come to a very different conclusion. Democracies tend to win the wars they fight--specifically, about eighty percent of the time.
Complementing their wide-ranging case-study analysis, the authors apply innovative statistical tests and new hypotheses. In unusually clear prose, they pinpoint two reasons for democracies' success at war. First, as elected leaders understand that losing a war can spell domestic political backlash, democracies start only those wars they are likely to win. Secondly, the emphasis on individuality within democratic societies means that their soldiers fight with greater initiative and superior leadership.
Surprisingly, Reiter and Stam find that it is neither economic muscle nor bandwagoning between democratic powers that enables democracies to win wars. They also show that, given societal consent, democracies are willing to initiate wars of empire or genocide. On the whole, they find, democracies' dependence on public consent makes for more, rather than less, effective foreign policy. Taking a fresh approach to a question that has long merited such a study, this book yields crucial insights on security policy, the causes of war, and the interplay between domestic politics and international relations.
Complementing their wide-ranging case-study analysis, the authors apply innovative statistical tests and new hypotheses. In unusually clear prose, they pinpoint two reasons for democracies' success at war. First, as elected leaders understand that losing a war can spell domestic political backlash, democracies start only those wars they are likely to win. Secondly, the emphasis on individuality within democratic societies means that their soldiers fight with greater initiative and superior leadership.
Surprisingly, Reiter and Stam find that it is neither economic muscle nor bandwagoning between democratic powers that enables democracies to win wars. They also show that, given societal consent, democracies are willing to initiate wars of empire or genocide. On the whole, they find, democracies' dependence on public consent makes for more, rather than less, effective foreign policy. Taking a fresh approach to a question that has long merited such a study, this book yields crucial insights on security policy, the causes of war, and the interplay between domestic politics and international relations.
ავტორის შესახებ
Dan Reiter is Associate Professor and Winship Research Professor in the Department of Political Science at Emory University. He is the author of Crucible of Beliefs: Learning, Alliances, and World Wars. Allan C. Stam is Associate Professor of Government and Deputy Director of Academic Programs at Rockefeller Center, Dartmouth College. He is the author of Win, Lose, or Draw: Domestic Politics and the Crucible of War.
შეაფასეთ ეს ელწიგნი
გვითხარით თქვენი აზრი.
ინფორმაცია წაკითხვასთან დაკავშირებით
სმარტფონები და ტაბლეტები
დააინსტალირეთ Google Play Books აპი Android და iPad/iPhone მოწყობილობებისთვის. ის ავტომატურად განახორციელებს სინქრონიზაციას თქვენს ანგარიშთან და საშუალებას მოგცემთ, წაიკითხოთ სასურველი კონტენტი ნებისმიერ ადგილას, როგორც ონლაინ, ისე ხაზგარეშე რეჟიმში.
ლეპტოპები და კომპიუტერები
Google Play-ში შეძენილი აუდიოწიგნების მოსმენა თქვენი კომპიუტერის ვებ-ბრაუზერის გამოყენებით შეგიძლიათ.
ელწამკითხველები და სხვა მოწყობილობები
ელექტრონული მელნის მოწყობილობებზე წასაკითხად, როგორიცაა Kobo eReaders, თქვენ უნდა ჩამოტვირთოთ ფაილი და გადაიტანოთ იგი თქვენს მოწყობილობაში. დახმარების ცენტრის დეტალური ინსტრუქციების მიხედვით გადაიტანეთ ფაილები მხარდაჭერილ ელწამკითხველებზე.
